Missouri Advocates For Families Affected by Autism
We are a citizens action group advocating and lobbying for families that have a child with special needs. We believe that EVERY child has a right to a FREE and APPROPRIATE EDUCATION and should NEVER BE LEFT BEHIND.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Public Corruption
Jeff Grisamore Not: Public Corruption
Public CorruptionWhy It’s Our #1 Criminal Priority
03/26/10
Public corruption is a breach of trust by federal, state, or local officials—often with the help of private sector accomplices. It’s also the FBI’s top criminal investigative priority. To explain why the Bureau takes public corruption so seriously and how we investigate, we talked with Special Agent Patrick Bohrer, assistant section chief of our Public Corruption/Civil Rights program at FBI Headquarters.
Public corruption is a breach of trust by federal, state, or local officials—often with the help of private sector accomplices. It’s also the FBI’s top criminal investigative priority. To explain why the Bureau takes public corruption so seriously and how we investigate, we talked with Special Agent Patrick Bohrer, assistant section chief of our Public Corruption/Civil Rights program at FBI Headquarters.
Question: Why is public corruption so high on the FBI’s list of investigative priorities?
Answer: Because of its impact. Corrupt public officials undermine our country’s national security, our overall safety, the public trust, and confidence in the U.S. government, wasting billions of dollars along the way. This corruption can tarnish virtually every aspect of society. For example, a border official might take a bribe, knowingly or unknowingly letting in a truck containing weapons of mass destruction. Or corrupt state legislators could cast deciding votes on a bill providing funding or other benefits to a company for the wrong reasons. Or at the local level, a building inspector might be paid to overlook some bad wiring, which could cause a deadly fire down the road.
Answer: Because of its impact. Corrupt public officials undermine our country’s national security, our overall safety, the public trust, and confidence in the U.S. government, wasting billions of dollars along the way. This corruption can tarnish virtually every aspect of society. For example, a border official might take a bribe, knowingly or unknowingly letting in a truck containing weapons of mass destruction. Or corrupt state legislators could cast deciding votes on a bill providing funding or other benefits to a company for the wrong reasons. Or at the local level, a building inspector might be paid to overlook some bad wiring, which could cause a deadly fire down the road.
Q: Can you describe the kinds of public corruption that the FBI investigates?
A: It really runs the gamut. Bribery is the most common. But there’s also extortion, embezzlement, racketeering, kickbacks, and money laundering, as well as wire, mail, bank, and tax fraud. Right now, based on our intelligence on emerging trends, we are focused specifically on several major issues: corruption along our national borders; corrupt officials who take advantage of natural disasters or economic crises to divert some of the government’s aid into their own pockets; and a myriad of officials who may personally benefit from the economic stimulus funding.
Q: Where do you find this corruption?
A: Just about everywhere—at the federal, state, and local levels throughout the country. And I should point out, the vast majority of our country’s public officials are honest and work hard to improve the lives of the American people. But a small number make decisions for the wrong reasons—usually, to line their own pockets or those of friends and family. These people can be found—and have been found—in legislatures, courts, city halls, law enforcement departments, school and zoning boards, government agencies of all kinds (including those that regulate elections and transportation), and even companies that do business with government.
Q: How does the FBI investigate public corruption?
A: We’re in a unique position to investigate allegations of public corruption. Our lawful use of sophisticated investigative tools and methods—like undercover operations, court-authorized electronic surveillance, and informants—often gives us a front-row seat to witness the actual exchange of bribe money or a backroom handshake that seals an illegal deal…and enough evidence to send the culprits to prison. But we have plenty of help. We often work in conjunction with the inspector general offices from various federal agencies, as well as with our state and local partners. And we depend greatly on assistance from the public. So let me end by saying, if anyone out there has any information about potential wrongdoing by a public official, please submit a tip online or contact your local FBI field office. Your help really makes a difference.
A: It really runs the gamut. Bribery is the most common. But there’s also extortion, embezzlement, racketeering, kickbacks, and money laundering, as well as wire, mail, bank, and tax fraud. Right now, based on our intelligence on emerging trends, we are focused specifically on several major issues: corruption along our national borders; corrupt officials who take advantage of natural disasters or economic crises to divert some of the government’s aid into their own pockets; and a myriad of officials who may personally benefit from the economic stimulus funding.
Q: Where do you find this corruption?
A: Just about everywhere—at the federal, state, and local levels throughout the country. And I should point out, the vast majority of our country’s public officials are honest and work hard to improve the lives of the American people. But a small number make decisions for the wrong reasons—usually, to line their own pockets or those of friends and family. These people can be found—and have been found—in legislatures, courts, city halls, law enforcement departments, school and zoning boards, government agencies of all kinds (including those that regulate elections and transportation), and even companies that do business with government.
Q: How does the FBI investigate public corruption?
A: We’re in a unique position to investigate allegations of public corruption. Our lawful use of sophisticated investigative tools and methods—like undercover operations, court-authorized electronic surveillance, and informants—often gives us a front-row seat to witness the actual exchange of bribe money or a backroom handshake that seals an illegal deal…and enough evidence to send the culprits to prison. But we have plenty of help. We often work in conjunction with the inspector general offices from various federal agencies, as well as with our state and local partners. And we depend greatly on assistance from the public. So let me end by saying, if anyone out there has any information about potential wrongdoing by a public official, please submit a tip online or contact your local FBI field office. Your help really makes a difference.
Resource:
- Public corruption
- Public corruption
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Lawsuit against Ca DOE for systematic failure of disabled children continues - National special education | Examiner.com
Lawsuit against Ca DOE for systematic failure of disabled children continues - National special education | Examiner.com
Lawsuit against Ca DOE for systematic failure of disabled children continues
Lawsuit against Ca DOE for systematic failure of disabled children continues
· APRIL 9, 2013
A federal district judge in Sacramento has denied a motion by the California Department of Education (CDE) to dismiss a lawsuit brought by two parent associations on behalf of children with disabilities. (Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Ass’n v. Calif. Department of Educ (U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist., Calif. No. 2:11-cv-3471-KJM-AC)). The parents have charged the department with systematically failing to assure that their children receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as required by federal and state law. The Court’s ruling of March 29 means the plaintiffs’ case may move forward.
Plaintiffs’ lead counsel Rony Sagy, of San Francisco’s Sagy Law Associates called the ruling “an important breakthrough for California children with special needs.” The
complaint, filed in 2012 by Sagy Law Associates and co-counsel Stephen Rosenbaum of Berkeley, details the experiences of numerous children who have suffered as a result of
CDE’s systematic failure to adequately monitor, investigate and enforce laws at the school district level.
complaint, filed in 2012 by Sagy Law Associates and co-counsel Stephen Rosenbaum of Berkeley, details the experiences of numerous children who have suffered as a result of
CDE’s systematic failure to adequately monitor, investigate and enforce laws at the school district level.
The complaint alleges, for example, that children with behavior problems have been improperly tied to their chairs and excluded from all educational opportunities. In
another instance, plaintiffs claim that a 14-year-old who was bullied and had attempted suicide, was determined to have no social or emotional needs. The non-English-speaking
parents of a child with an autism diagnosis and ADHD were told the district had lost his records and demanded the parents agree to an educational program with dramatically
reduced services.
another instance, plaintiffs claim that a 14-year-old who was bullied and had attempted suicide, was determined to have no social or emotional needs. The non-English-speaking
parents of a child with an autism diagnosis and ADHD were told the district had lost his records and demanded the parents agree to an educational program with dramatically
reduced services.
Other systemic allegations include
· unreasonable delays in student assessments,
· sidelining parents in the educational planning process
· failure to implement behavior and other educational plans
· failure to offer services to students transitioning from high school to adult living
· filing for unnecessary due process hearings against parents asking for an independent educational evaluation of their child.
The plaintiffs also claim that CDE’s own statistics show that California school districts are consistently performing below the minimal federal requirements, and the targets set by the department itself, in areas such as proficiency rates in English and math.
CDE had argued that the court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs’ lawsuit because the federal Department of Education had exclusive authority to enforce the State’s monitoring and enforcement obligations.
The Court disagreed, finding that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act explicitly charges the states with frontline responsibility to ensure the provision of a free appropriate public education.
The department also maintained that there was no private right of action to sue under federal law. The Court again disagreed. The Court also rejected CDE’s argument that the plaintiffs were barred from pursuing their special education claims because they had not exhausted their administrative remedies, such as a due process hearing or a compliance complaint filed with the department.
Plaintiffs’ attorney Sagy highlighted the need for a prompt resolution: “The stakes for these young people and their parents could not be higher. Taxpayers’ money is increasingly spent on legal fees to fight parents, rather than to provide their children with the necessary educational services.” According to the complaint, one school district spent $80,000 in an unsuccessful effort to avoid reimbursing parents the $4,500 cost of a statutorily provided independent educational evaluation. Sagy said plaintiffs hope to minimize the cost of litigation by engaging CDE in a mediated process designed to address the endemic problems alleged in the complaint.
The department had rebuffed earlier efforts to mediate.
CDE is represented by Paul Lacy and Kate Legrand of the department’s Legal Division.
Autistic man beaten by caregiver highlights increasing safety issues - Chicago Autism & Parenting | Examiner.com
Autistic man beaten by caregiver highlights increasing safety issues - Chicago Autism & Parenting | Examiner.com
This kind of abuse has become very normal for children and adults with autism in the public school system, residential centers and by many hired caregivers. How are we supposed to keep our children and adults with autism safe in a world that does not understand them and is quick to abuse them? And most abusers get away with it.
Autistic man beaten by caregiver highlights increasing safety issues
April 10, 2013
http://www.examiner.com/article/autistic-man-beaten-by-caregiver-highlights-increasing-safety-issues
Autism parents often worry about how teachers, counselors, and other caregivers treat their children when mom or dad isn't around. This is especially true for parents of nonverbal kids, who are unable to advocate for themselves in many situations. The nightmare of abuse at the hands of caregivers was realized by one family this week. NBC 7 news in San Diego reported on April 8, that a man accused of abusing an autistic patient began his trial for the alleged crimes.
The man stands accused of beating a 23-year-old autistic man left in his care while the parents were out of town. The alleged victim in this case is non-verbal and engages in self-injurious behavior. A camera in the home captured footage of the abuse, and reportedly captured 2,000 images of violence against the young man. His mother reported that there are typically five caregivers in the home to help take care of his needs. The 50-year-old caregiver faces seven felony counts of abuse in the case. Another man has also been accused in the alleged abuse.
Parents have been increasingly concerned about the treatment that autistic children receive while in school or with other caregivers. The National Autism Association estimates that more than 200 students have died within the last five years due to restraints used in schools. Currently, no federal regulations exist to protect children from restraint practices that interfere with the ability to breathe. A study conducted by the University of Pennsylvania shows that over 18 percent of children with autism have been physically abused.
With such staggering statistics, it may seem difficult for parents of autistic children to know how to protect against abuse and restraint. Cameras, such as those used by the parents of the 23-year-old in San Diego, are a good starting point. Social stories can also be used to help children anticipate dangerous scenarios, and can help to communicate if they have experienced something similar. Parents should communicate with teachers and caregivers regularly. If it is possible, unannounced visits to schools can help to comfort the child and give parents peace of mind.
When it comes to autistic children who can't communicate abuse, parents must be vigilant to prevent abuse. Even the most seasoned caregivers can become frustrated with some children, but it is never an excuse for harming a child.
This kind of abuse has become very normal for children and adults with autism in the public school system, residential centers and by many hired caregivers. How are we supposed to keep our children and adults with autism safe in a world that does not understand them and is quick to abuse them? And most abusers get away with it.
Autistic man beaten by caregiver highlights increasing safety issues
April 10, 2013
http://www.examiner.com/article/autistic-man-beaten-by-caregiver-highlights-increasing-safety-issuesAutism parents often worry about how teachers, counselors, and other caregivers treat their children when mom or dad isn't around. This is especially true for parents of nonverbal kids, who are unable to advocate for themselves in many situations. The nightmare of abuse at the hands of caregivers was realized by one family this week. NBC 7 news in San Diego reported on April 8, that a man accused of abusing an autistic patient began his trial for the alleged crimes.
The man stands accused of beating a 23-year-old autistic man left in his care while the parents were out of town. The alleged victim in this case is non-verbal and engages in self-injurious behavior. A camera in the home captured footage of the abuse, and reportedly captured 2,000 images of violence against the young man. His mother reported that there are typically five caregivers in the home to help take care of his needs. The 50-year-old caregiver faces seven felony counts of abuse in the case. Another man has also been accused in the alleged abuse.
Parents have been increasingly concerned about the treatment that autistic children receive while in school or with other caregivers. The National Autism Association estimates that more than 200 students have died within the last five years due to restraints used in schools. Currently, no federal regulations exist to protect children from restraint practices that interfere with the ability to breathe. A study conducted by the University of Pennsylvania shows that over 18 percent of children with autism have been physically abused.
With such staggering statistics, it may seem difficult for parents of autistic children to know how to protect against abuse and restraint. Cameras, such as those used by the parents of the 23-year-old in San Diego, are a good starting point. Social stories can also be used to help children anticipate dangerous scenarios, and can help to communicate if they have experienced something similar. Parents should communicate with teachers and caregivers regularly. If it is possible, unannounced visits to schools can help to comfort the child and give parents peace of mind.
When it comes to autistic children who can't communicate abuse, parents must be vigilant to prevent abuse. Even the most seasoned caregivers can become frustrated with some children, but it is never an excuse for harming a child.
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Lawmakers debate Common Core funding » Top Stories » The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO
Jeff Grisamore Not: Lawmakers debate Common Core funding » Top Stories » The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO
Maybe our lawmakers are happy that we are 47th in the country and don't want to live up to the standards of other states.
Maybe our lawmakers are happy that we are 47th in the country and don't want to live up to the standards of other states.
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Republicans in the Missouri General Assembly have proposed legislation that could limit or bar the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education from implementing Common Core State Standards in the state.
The Missouri Republican Party’s official opposition to the plan began last June, when at their convention the delegates passed a resolution opposing Common Core Standards.
State Rep. Charlie Davis, R-Joplin, said while he sees education as a priority of state government, he does not want to accept some national standards.
“The education of our children is a priority of mine. Ensuring that we are truly educating them is the responsibility of our local school boards. Local control is important to me,” Davis said last week.
The issue came up again last month while the House of Representatives was debating its fiscal year 2014 budget. State Rep. Kurt Bahr, R-St. Charles, offered an amendment that would ban the state from spending any money to implement Common Core standards.
Bahr said he opposed the program because he is concerned about the cost of its implementation, accessibility for rural districts to be able to participate in online tests, and a general desire to protect state sovereignty from the federal government.
“We don’t have the control over standards or the nature of the assessment in our state,” he said, adding that he is concerned that more liberal national and international groups might gain influence over Missouri education.
“The people who work in the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) and the U.N. (United Nations) are going to tend to be more liberal, so I think it’s fair to ask what kind of liberal materials could be forced on our kids,” he said last week.
Despite broad opposition from the GOP, the standards have received support from most local school districts, including the St. Charles School District in Bahr’s district, and many school officials in Southwest Missouri, including Joplin, Webb City, Neosho and Carthage.
The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, which is lobbying the Legislature against limits on the program, called Common Core standards “uniform learning goals” that would assist a student if he or she moves to a different school district, or even a different state.
Chris Nicastro, commissioner of education, said the goals will help students identify the knowledge and skills they will need to succeed when they graduate, regardless of their career path.
In addition to his budget amendment, Bahr has also filed legislation that would put a complete ban on implementing Common Core Standards. That legislation has passed out of the Downsizing State Government Committee, and is currently in the House Rules Committee. His bill has been sponsored by House Speaker Tim Jones, State Rep. Bill Lant, R-Neosho, and a dozen other lawmakers.
In the Senate, Sen. John Lamping, R-St. Louis, filed legislation that would require the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to conduct public hearings in all eight of the state’s congressional districts before implementing the program.
The Missouri Republican Party’s official opposition to the plan began last June, when at their convention the delegates passed a resolution opposing Common Core Standards.
State Rep. Charlie Davis, R-Joplin, said while he sees education as a priority of state government, he does not want to accept some national standards.
“The education of our children is a priority of mine. Ensuring that we are truly educating them is the responsibility of our local school boards. Local control is important to me,” Davis said last week.
The issue came up again last month while the House of Representatives was debating its fiscal year 2014 budget. State Rep. Kurt Bahr, R-St. Charles, offered an amendment that would ban the state from spending any money to implement Common Core standards.
Bahr said he opposed the program because he is concerned about the cost of its implementation, accessibility for rural districts to be able to participate in online tests, and a general desire to protect state sovereignty from the federal government.
“We don’t have the control over standards or the nature of the assessment in our state,” he said, adding that he is concerned that more liberal national and international groups might gain influence over Missouri education.
“The people who work in the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) and the U.N. (United Nations) are going to tend to be more liberal, so I think it’s fair to ask what kind of liberal materials could be forced on our kids,” he said last week.
Despite broad opposition from the GOP, the standards have received support from most local school districts, including the St. Charles School District in Bahr’s district, and many school officials in Southwest Missouri, including Joplin, Webb City, Neosho and Carthage.
The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, which is lobbying the Legislature against limits on the program, called Common Core standards “uniform learning goals” that would assist a student if he or she moves to a different school district, or even a different state.
Chris Nicastro, commissioner of education, said the goals will help students identify the knowledge and skills they will need to succeed when they graduate, regardless of their career path.
In addition to his budget amendment, Bahr has also filed legislation that would put a complete ban on implementing Common Core Standards. That legislation has passed out of the Downsizing State Government Committee, and is currently in the House Rules Committee. His bill has been sponsored by House Speaker Tim Jones, State Rep. Bill Lant, R-Neosho, and a dozen other lawmakers.
In the Senate, Sen. John Lamping, R-St. Louis, filed legislation that would require the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to conduct public hearings in all eight of the state’s congressional districts before implementing the program.
Saturday, April 6, 2013
Lee’s Summit R-VII School District Aquatic Center
Jeff Grisamore Not: Lee’s Summit R-VII School District Aquatic Center - Award Winners, Education Projects, Control Systems - Aquatics International Page 1 of 3
They do not use this center for aquatic therapy. Wouldn't that be a great way to help their disabled students.
Find out why aquatic therapy can benefit children with:
• ADHD
• Apraxia
• Asperger syndrome
• Auditory processing difficulties
• Autism Spectrum Disorder
• Cerebral palsy
• Chromosomal abnormalities
• Developmental dyspraxia
• Down Syndrome
• Gross motor delays
• Hemiparesis
• Hemiplegia
• Hodgkins lymphoma
• Hydrocephalus
• Hypotonia
• Issues associated with premature birth
• Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
• Lack of core strength
• Language disabilities
• Learning disabilities
• Motor planning issues
• Multiple sclerosis
• Muscular dystrophy
• Periventricular leukomalacia
• Pervasive Developmental Disorder
• Rett syndrome
• Seizure disorders
• Sensory integration dysfunction
• Sensory Processing Disorder
• Spastic diplegia
They do not use this center for aquatic therapy. Wouldn't that be a great way to help their disabled students.
Find out why aquatic therapy can benefit children with:
• ADHD
• Apraxia
• Asperger syndrome
• Auditory processing difficulties
• Autism Spectrum Disorder
• Cerebral palsy
• Chromosomal abnormalities
• Developmental dyspraxia
• Down Syndrome
• Gross motor delays
• Hemiparesis
• Hemiplegia
• Hodgkins lymphoma
• Hydrocephalus
• Hypotonia
• Issues associated with premature birth
• Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
• Lack of core strength
• Language disabilities
• Learning disabilities
• Motor planning issues
• Multiple sclerosis
• Muscular dystrophy
• Periventricular leukomalacia
• Pervasive Developmental Disorder
• Rett syndrome
• Seizure disorders
• Sensory integration dysfunction
• Sensory Processing Disorder
• Spastic diplegia
Lee’s Summit R-VII School District Aquatic Center
- Be the first to comment
- Share
Lee’s Summit, is a growing suburb just south of Kansas City, Mo., and the school district struggled for years to find space for three high school swim teams to practice. When leaders decided it was time to build a new competition facility they hired a local design team with the intention of creating a facility featuring the perfect balance of amenities, ideal for use by three existing high schools, and a planned fourth high school. Opened in 2009, that facility is now known as Lee’s Summit R-VII School District Aquatic Center.
While effectively accommodating swim competitions, the new aquatic center was developed primarily for practices and team development, rather than for hosting large meets and events. This enabled the school district to have first-class water without the expense of an arena with large amounts of seating. The completed 10-lane-by-50-meter pool can accommodate 23 short course lanes, each available for simultaneous practice sessions.
Another configuration allows for an eight-lane short course meet, with four lanes of warm-up cool-down, to occur while a diving competition is simultaneously occurring. Deep-water areas are located at each end, allowing for starts off of blocks and flip turns and a movable bulkhead allows for a variety of teaching components and many different events, including large long-course meets to smaller short course head-to-head matches between schools. Locker room facilities and the main lobby, including access to concessions, are located adjacent to the pool
In addition to serving the high school competitive swimmers, the facility is open to the community and designed to be flexible for a wide range of use and events. Shallow portions of the pool accommodate community programming and are located in the center with ramped access.
The aquatic center design focuses on the safety and comfort of swimmers and spectators. To control sound, acoustical metal roof deck and acoustical masonry units were used in the pool area. Insulated precast concrete wall panels were used to create an energy-efficient building envelope.
In the pool itself, the filtration system includes larger vessels, which lower energy-use and result in longer filter runs before the filters must be cleaned by backwashing. This both improves the effective filtration of the water and results in less water consumed.
An ultraviolet light system also enhances both water and air quality. The system neutralizes pathogens that could potentially make the swimmers sick, and helps eliminate chloramines. Chloramines adversely affect the quality of the air, causing discomfort to guests and corrosion throughout.
Mechanical systems with state-of the-art temperature and humidity controls provide six air changes per hour for the comfort of the swimmers. Systems keep the air temperature within two degrees of the water temperature, providing for a comfortable space for swimmers and guests. As the system dehumidifies the air, it reclaims lost heat and water to return it back to the pool. This conserves energy and water.
Large swim meets are not the focus of the facility, but there is elevated spectator seating for 400. The seating area features glass railings, helping eliminate obstructed views of the pool, and state-of-the-art “tube” lighting is used to illuminate the interior of the pool area. There are no exterior windows.
The overall interior had to present a ‘neutral’ site because it is used by three high schools. The building features warm wood tones, natural stone, glass, and stained concrete floors. Painted graphics throughout incorporate the school colors for the three high schools.
The three schools also were a factor in finding the appropriate location for the facility. The school district preferred a central location, but also did not want to give any one high school an advantage over the others based upon location. Ultimately, a middle school campus was selected as a neutral site, which eliminated the cost of land purchase and provided for shared parking.
Today the aquatic center’s primary function is to provide a swimming and diving facility for high school competitive teams, with opportunities for middle school intramurals, physical education/health instruction, extracurricular elementary swim lessons, and community aquatics. Finding a successful design required considerable input from the school district staff, and community groups and the result is a state-of-the-art facility that meets the needs of both student athletes and the community.
Friday, April 5, 2013
Why Does Aquatic Therapy Help With Autism?
Jeff Grisamore Not: Why Does Aquatic Therapy Help With Autism?
To Your Health,
Maria Rickert Hong, AADP
Certified Holistic Health Counselor
www.MariaRickertHong.com
Why Does Aquatic Therapy Help with Autism, PDD-NOS, ADHD and SPD?
Join me as I interview Ailene Tisser and Cindy Freedman,
Owners of Angelfish Therapy
Wednesday, April 10th at 1:00pm ET
| | Aquatic Therapy Ailene Tisser and Cindy Freedman are owners of Angelfish Therapy, which helps children with a variety of special needs, sensory issues, and motor-coordination difficulties reach their full potential through fun and challenging aquatic therapy sessions, swim lessons and even land-based therapy. Sign up today and find out why aquatic therapy can benefit children with: |
- ADHD
- Apraxia
- Asperger syndrome
- Auditory processing difficulties
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Cerebral palsy
- Chromosomal abnormalities
- Developmental dyspraxia
- Down Syndrome
- Gross motor delays
- Hemiparesis
- Hemiplegia
- Hodgkins lymphoma
- Hydrocephalus
- Hypotonia
- Issues associated with premature birth
- Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
- Lack of core strength
- Language disabilities
- Learning disabilities
- Motor planning issues
- Multiple sclerosis
- Muscular dystrophy
- Periventricular leukomalacia
- Pervasive Developmental Disorder
- Rett syndrome
- Seizure disorders
- Sensory integration dysfunction
- Sensory Processing Disorder
- Spastic diplegia
Maria Rickert Hong, AADP
Certified Holistic Health Counselor
www.MariaRickertHong.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)